Appeal Court sets aside lower court's order restraining Edo APC from holding gov primary - GFH NEWS
  • Advertise
  • Contact
GFH NEWS
Ecobank Super Rewards
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Sports
  • Education
  • Others
    • Security
    • Metro/General News
    • Crime
    • Law/Judiciary
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Sports
  • Education
  • Others
    • Security
    • Metro/General News
    • Crime
    • Law/Judiciary
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
GFH NEWS
No Result
View All Result

Appeal Court sets aside lower court’s order restraining Edo APC from holding gov primary

gfhnews.com by gfhnews.com
June 18, 2020
in Uncategorized
0

The Court of Appeal has set aside the June 8 judgment of the Federal High Court (FHC) in Benin which restrained the All Progressives Congress (APC)from conducting the June 22 governorship primary election in Edo using direct mode.

The Appeal Court in Benin also ordered the continuation of the trial at FHC, which will hold Friday morning.

The presiding judge, Justice Morenike Ogunwomiju, who was accompanied by Justices Sam Oseji and Moore Adumein, in Thursday evening’s judgments in the appeals by APC and its suspended National Chairman, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, described as problematic, the order by Justice Mohammed Umar of FHC, Benin.

In the lead judgment in the suit by APC, delivered by Justice Ogunwomiju and backed by Justice Oseji, she said:

“The trial judge (Justice Umar) gave a problematic order that was not sought by the parties to the suit.

As at the date (June 8) the order was given, the political party (APC in Edo State) had 14 days to organise its governorship primary election. Every judge must be a democrat.

“The appellant (APC) was not given an opportunity to be heard by the trial court.

‘The injunctive order of the trial court of June 8 is hereby set aside. The administrative orders subsist and the issue of jurisdiction should be determined by the trial court.”

In his dissenting judgment in the APC’s suit, Justice Adumein declared that the injunctive order of FHC ought not to have been set aside, insisting that the appeal was interlocutory, incompetent and should be struck out.

Adumein noted that the trial court did not make any mistake in the matter, in line with Section 285, Sub-section 8 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, adding that court should not decide cases based on sentiments.

In the second suit filed by Oshiomhole, the only judgment was read by Justice Oseji, who declared that the appeal lacked merit and it was premature, thereby striking it out.

Previous Post

NIMASA’s floating dock to generate N1bn monthly – DG

Next Post

Sylva did not demand $20m for Bayelsa re-run elections – NCDMB

gfhnews.com

gfhnews.com

Next Post

Sylva did not demand $20m for Bayelsa re-run elections – NCDMB

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Agriculture
  • Aviation
  • Banking
  • Business
  • Celebration
  • Corruption
  • Crime
  • Culture
  • Cyber security
  • Disaster
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • FACT CHECK
  • Feature
  • Filmmaking
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Foreign
  • Health
  • Holiday
  • Home Ownership
  • Housing
  • Information
  • Infrastructure
  • Journalism
  • Labour
  • Law enforcement
  • Law/Judiciary
  • Metro/General News
  • Mining
  • Music
  • Oil&gas
  • Philanthropy
  • Politics
  • Religion
  • Science
  • Security
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • Tourism
  • Trade
  • Tragedy
  • Transportation
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized
  • Violence
  • Wildlife
  • work
  • Advertise
  • Contact

© 2024 GFH News

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Crime
  • Health
  • Security
  • Contact

© 2024 GFH News